吾之用吾用到這個麼打呢....？

上星期用過，真的好很好很勁，但齒比吾好太少，

但3010好快會頂吾，只有等佢死.....！

一死之就緊係換....4...5...6...2....啦....！

The topic post asked this:

"請問....？？...有沒有車友知道，四驅的原裝底版（無加Fet）可吾可以落這個(Stock R)麼打玩呢.......！"

四驅的原裝底版 (M010 PCB) meets the requirement that the website www.rcatomic.com shows.
I guess "hs?k" mixed that up with the AM PCB of the MR01 and the early version of MR02 that contains only 3004 x 2. That caused the problem.

原帖由 APPLE 於 2007-5-28 16:25 發表
上星期用過，真的好很好很勁，但齒比吾好太少，

但3010好快會頂吾，只有等佢死.....！

一死之就緊係換....4...5...6...2....啦....！

The website of the motor also gives you a recommended gear ratio but the package says nothing. That is the question.

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 16:31 發表
The topic post asked this:

"請問....？？...有沒有車友知道，四驅的原裝底版（無加Fet）可吾可以落這個(Stock R)麼打玩呢.......！"

四驅的原裝底版 (M010 PCB) meets the requirement that th ...

The problem is, have you ever try it on a stock AM PCB on a " Smoothly, Efficient drive train and so called Conservative gear ratio " AWD ?  If not,  YOU ARE MISLEADING .

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 16:33 發表


The website of the motor also gives you a recommended gear ratio but the package says nothing. That is the question.

Please dont bluff. Show us how your " Smooth, Efficient with conservative drive ratio " Stock AM PCB works with this motor at CT  

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 16:38 發表


The problem is, have you ever try it on a stock AM PCB on a " Smoothly, Efficient drive train and so called Conservative gear ratio " AWD ?  If not,  YOU ARE MISLEADING .

Note that   "stock AM PCB" is not equal to "stock AWD PCB". The original post asked about the latter.

"Stock AM PCB" refers to all AM PCBs (some have only 2X 3004) while  "stock AWD PCB" is M010 PCB which has 2X 3010 Fets.

If you keep on talking about "stock AM PCB", you are just giving an irrelevant answer.

I have never tried it on a "stock AM PCB" and I don't think that can be an answer to the original post by APPLE. If you really want to help others out on this site, read everything carefully please before you post a reply.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 16:57 編輯 ]

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-22 13:17 發表
Should be OK with the M010 PCB but you have to ensure other things run smoothly. Is the drive train efficient? Is the gear ratio conservative? Is the motor of good condition? Questions like these.

唔知點解總有 D 人係喜歡拋書包..??? drive train efficient 你懂咩??? motor of good condition 你知咩??

咁請問你架 AWD 用乜 motor? run smoothly 嗎? drive train efficient 嗎?..  gear ratio conservative嗎? your motor good condition嗎?

唔好答我其他墅


人地好似問可吾可以落這個(Stock R)麼打玩..

可唔可以包括 (run smoothly 嗎? drive train efficient 嗎?..  gear ratio conservative? motor good condition嗎?)

原帖由 LCG 於 2007-5-28 16:56 發表



唔知點解總有 D 人係喜歡拋書包..??? drive train efficient 你懂咩??? motor of good condition 你知咩??

咁請問你架 AWD 用乜 motor? run smoothly 嗎? drive train efficient 嗎?..  gear ratio con ...

I recognize you of course! You are the one who often changes your ID and make your fonts bigger when you get angry! Nice to talk to you.

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 17:00 發表


I recognize you of course! You are the one who often changes your ID and make your fonts bigger when you get angry! Nice to talk to you.

So What

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 17:00 發表


I recognize you of course! You are the one who often changes your ID and make your fonts bigger when you get angry! Nice to talk to you.

So What

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 16:45 發表


Note that   "stock AM PCB" is not equal to "stock AWD PCB". The original post asked about the latter.
If you keep on talking about "stock AM PCB", you are just g ...

Oh. you want to switch topic again. You really think a " Stock AM PCB of a Stock AWD " do have difference with a " Stock AWD PCB " ?    I know why you always replied so many negatives and confusing post at other forums

So, have you ever tried the subject motor with the stated electronic before answering the host'is question?

If people know the answer, why they post a thread and ask ? you question them back ? want to show yourself to be an expert or some kind ?

[ 本帖最後由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:08 編輯 ]

I mentioned "drive train efficiency", "motor condition" and "gear ratio" because a faster motor (like the one on the picture) is closing to the limitation of the AWD M010 PCB. If we are careless on the three things, we can still burn the fets. Even if you are using the motors provided by Kyosho, you can still get the PCB burnt if you stop the motor from running by force. Provided a faster motor like the one on the picture, you raise the possibility of burning your PCB.

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 17:09 發表
I mentioned "drive train efficiency", "motor condition" and "gear ratio" because a faster motor (like the one on the picture) is closing to the limitation of the AWD M ...

Now, this is the positive and appropriate way of feedbacks you should have.  

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:06 發表


Oh. you want to switch topic again. You really think a " Stock AM PCB of a Stock AWD " do have difference with a " Stock AWD PCB " ?    I know why you always replied so ...

APPLE asked, "可吾可以落這個(Stock R)麼打".
He didn't ask whether we have tried the motor. So who is switching the topic?

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:06 發表


If people know the answer, why they post a thread and ask ? you question them back ? want to show yourself to be an expert or some kind ?

This is very interesting. When my students ask me questions, sometimes I choose to ask them back other questions so they learnt even better. This is a "problem based learning" approach. We don't always have to give, give, give. A good teacher can make students learn how to learn finally. As for weaker students, I give them answers directly. An example is this reply.

As for the "expert" question, I guess giving answers on forum to others is not equal to "showing that oneself is an expert" or else no one dares to give an answer.

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-28 17:12 發表


APPLE asked, "可吾可以落這個(Stock R)麼打".
He didn't ask whether we have tried the motor. So who is switching the topic?

Definitely, so why you questioning him those " Pretending to be an expert " Questions, he didnt asked to be asked also.  

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:31 發表


Definitely, so why you questioning him those " Pretending to be an expert " Questions, he didnt asked to be asked also.  

Those are not exactly questions asking him. I just suggested him to check those things when using the motor.

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:12 發表

Now, this is the positive and appropriate way of feedbacks you should have.  

Thanks. At least more fruitful than what you are doing.

原帖由 hlsk 於 2007-5-28 17:31 發表


Definitely, so why you questioning him those " Pretending to be an expert " Questions, he didnt asked to be asked also.  

Those are not exactly questions asking him. I just suggested him to check those things when using the motor.

efficient drive train=轉動部份順唔順
motor condition=麼打殘唔殘
gear ratio=齒比

These are simple things. I like typying in English as it seems faster and easier to me. 只係你唔識姐，唔好話人扮expert.

[ 本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2007-5-29 12:00 編輯 ]

原帖由 billy86che 於 2007-5-29 11:57 發表


Those are not exactly questions asking him. I just suggested him to check those things when using the motor.

efficient drive train=轉動部份順唔順
motor condition=麼打殘唔殘
gear ratio=齒比 ...

It should be simply but sorry, you are the one who made simple things complicated. Always pretending, just pretending to be an expert.   ;P