RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: 加 Fet 前一問 [打印本頁]

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-9 14:19
標題: 加 Fet 前一問
想問下如加左 Fet 後如果PCB 瓜左, d Fet 仲用唔用得返?

作者: scalpel 時間: 2009-7-9 14:21

想問下如加左 Fet 後如果PCB 瓜左, d Fet 仲用唔用得返?
killermomo 發表於 2009-7-9 14:19

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

通常塊PCB瓜之前，都係啲Fet瓜先，啲Fet係有保護作用!

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-9 14:24
oh really..... 咁 jack 係加左 fet , pcb 仲襟玩d......

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 14:48
本帖最後由 800mah 於 2009-7-9 17:23 編輯

oh really..... 咁 jack 係加左 fet , pcb 仲襟玩d......
killermomo 發表於 2009-7-9 14:24

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

錯, 應該係相反.

情況等同越好跑o既跑鞋越快玩完, 比賽引擎一場就要換...

原裝FET 塊PCB一定最襟玩

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-9 15:46
oh really?! 因已用 speed v 麻打, 都覺唔夠快了, 開始想提升速度, 所以計劃先加 Fet 再改用手繞麼打..

作者: billy86che 時間: 2009-7-9 16:06

錯, 應該係相反.

情況等同越好跑o既跑鞋越快玩完, 比賽引擎一場就要換...

原裝FET 一定最襟玩
800mah 發表於 2009-7-9 14:48

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Original FETs (3010) are inferior to many others like the 4562 in terms of the max current that they allow and internal resistance. There shouldn't be any proof that 3010s are more durable.

But there is a high chance for the PCB to break down when someone replacing the FETs does not do their job quickly and thus it burns some of the ICs or even the Fets. You might have thus misblamed the new FETs. Instead, you should have blamed the person who changed the FETS for you.

作者: scalpel 時間: 2009-7-9 16:14

Original FETs (3010) are inferior to many others like the 4562 in terms of the max current that they allow and internal resistance. There shouldn't be any proof that 3010s are more durable.

But ...
billy86che 發表於 2009-7-9 16:06

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Exactly, as the person who helped me to add Fet, would test each level of the FET after soldering.....see they were working properly or not, make sure all each Fet was working to obtain the best performance!

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-9 16:29
So is there any suggestion that which shop adding Fet is better & reliable?

作者: scalpel 時間: 2009-7-9 16:30

So is there any suggestion that which shop adding Fet is better & reliable?
killermomo 發表於 2009-7-9 16:29

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Both CT and MMS are good for adding Fet!

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-9 16:48
Yeah!! Thank you ching.....is it really obviously improve after adding fet?

作者: scalpel 時間: 2009-7-9 17:10

Yeah!! Thank you ching.....is it really obviously improve after adding fet?
killermomo 發表於 2009-7-9 16:48

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

If you just using X speed....you won't really feel big difference.....If you change to AD stock or even Chili.....you will feel the difference.....and you will feel that the respond of the motor will be faster, especially when you release the trigger, then compress the trigger again!

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 17:21

Original FETs (3010) are inferior to many others like the 4562 in terms of the max current that they allow and internal resistance. There shouldn't be any proof that 3010s are more durable.

But ...
billy86che 發表於 2009-7-9 16:06

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

what i was trying to explain to 樓主was to differentiate between PCB and the FETs, the 3004/3010 are of coz inferior to 4562 7389 etc. but that fact that they burn easier will protect other parts of the PCB from failing.

so if u want the PCB to be durable (not the fets), use FETs that allow lesser current.

that's what i think ~

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 17:22

Yeah!! Thank you ching.....is it really obviously improve after adding fet?
killermomo 發表於 2009-7-9 16:48

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

performance increased.
but the durability of the PCB will decrease.

afterall, who will use the PCB for ten years.

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 17:27

通常塊PCB瓜之前，都係啲Fet瓜先，啲Fet係有保護作用!
scalpel 發表於 2009-7-9 14:21

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

所以換左 4562, 7389 之類o既勁FET, 你所講o既保護作用就會冇左.

作者: extra 時間: 2009-7-9 17:58

所以換左 4562, 7389 之類o既勁FET, 你所講o既保護作用就會冇左.
800mah 發表於 9-7-2009 05:27 PM

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Does it mean that FET = fuse? Since FET has to handle high current (like a gateway) so it will burnt first then no current pass the PCB circuit. There should be no guaranty that FET can protect the PCB. Please correct me if I am wrong.

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 21:07
FET is not a fuse, but the FET u use should commensurate with what the rest of the PCB can handle.

originally, it's always the FET that burns first under high current, but if u change the FET to something else, well... something will be different of coz.

作者: billy86che 時間: 2009-7-9 23:41
本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2009-7-9 23:54 編輯

所以換左 4562, 7389 之類o既勁FET, 你所講o既保護作用就會冇左.
800mah 發表於 2009-7-9 17:27

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

Wrong concept. Fets are not devices to protect the pcb and having lower quality Fets does not mean better protection for your pcb. (d人以為換fet塊pcb會易死d,其實通常係因為手工唔好.)

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-9 23:48

Wrong concept. Fets are not devices to protect the pcb and having lower quality Fets does not mean better protection for your pcb.
billy86che 發表於 2009-7-9 23:41

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

that's why i say "你所講o既保護作用" , sth he thinks , not me

作者: billy86che 時間: 2009-7-10 17:37
本帖最後由 billy86che 於 2009-7-10 17:41 編輯

18# 800mah

But it seems

that you support the idea of "original fets make the pcb more durable" in 4# when you said,

"錯, 應該係相反.
情況等同越好跑o既跑鞋越快玩完, 比賽引擎一場就要換
原裝FET 塊PCB一定最襟玩"

作者: 800mah 時間: 2009-7-11 02:15

18# 800mah

But it seems that you support the idea of "original fets make the pcb more durable" in 4# when you said,

"錯, 應該係相反.
情況等同越好跑o既跑鞋越快玩完, 比賽引擎一場就要換
原 ...
billy86che 發表於 2009-7-10 17:37

登錄/註冊後可看大圖

forget about it, i don't think the person who asked this is reading anymore

作者: killermomo 時間: 2009-7-11 23:18
咁多位 ching, 我有睇到架, 不過真係唔識點插口....
不過我會加....thank you

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://rc-evo.com/xbbs/)