RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: Question about FW-05+ [打印本頁]

作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-18 05:39
標題: Question about FW-05+
I want to change the engine for my FW-05T+ anybody know which one is better for 頭段 (for drift use) and fit 原裝計 b/c i don't want to change anything ar
Thank you

[ 本帖最後由 Eric_116 於 2007-7-18 05:46 編輯 ]
作者: RGM-111    時間: 2007-7-19 02:13
頭 同 尾 個差速 箱 對調  包你Drift 到 啊媽 都唔認得
作者: piccoengine    時間: 2007-7-19 04:34
原帖由 RGM-111 於 2007-7-19 02:13 發表
頭 同 尾 個差速 箱 對調  包你Drift 到 啊媽 都唔認得

師兄點解對調頭尾差速就會Drift??
可否解釋一下呢?
作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-19 06:25
原帖由 piccoengine 於 2007-7-19 04:34 發表

師兄點解對調頭尾差速就會Drift??
可否解釋一下呢?



yes i want to know why too please tell me thank you
作者: chrishkyung    時間: 2007-7-20 09:35
if change engine, maybe need to change clutch...its expensive

for drift, use drift tire is enough
作者: RGM-111    時間: 2007-7-21 00:48
因為05T+  原廠 是 行  頭直"濕", 尾行呀差...今你古下  對掉之後是....行尾直濕..wor
作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-21 01:12
原帖由 RGM-111 於 2007-7-21 00:48 發表
因為05T+  原廠 是 行  頭直"濕", 尾行呀差...今你古下  對掉之後是....行尾直濕..wor


Oh ic let me try thank you very much
作者: Neko    時間: 2007-7-24 18:16
原帖由 Eric_116 於 2007-7-21 01:12 發表


Oh ic let me try thank you very much


I await your good news...

You should consider tuning the tires and camber to achieve good drifting.  Spending money on the engine is unwise because you won't be using the full potential of the engine during drifting anyway.
作者: bigben    時間: 2007-7-25 15:53
what is 頭直"濕"?
作者: BHP    時間: 2007-7-25 16:13
I'm guessing 濕 = shaft
頭直"濕" = Front one-way shaft/diff ?
作者: Neko    時間: 2007-7-25 16:26
頭直"濕" = Front Straight Shaft.
ie. not diff, not one way, just shaft.
作者: bigben    時間: 2007-7-25 16:29
shaft only??

what is the advantage?

[ 本帖最後由 bigben 於 2007-7-25 16:30 編輯 ]
作者: Neko    時間: 2007-7-25 16:54
原帖由 bigben 於 2007-7-25 16:29 發表
shaft only??

what is the advantage?


More constant acceleration
作者: BHP    時間: 2007-7-25 17:28
原帖由 Neko 於 2007-7-25 16:54 發表
More constant acceleration

Wouldn't it understeer a lot with no front diff?
Surely, a straight shaft in front means good exit acceleration and stability.

But more stability = less speed.
With a front shaft, isn't it difficult to turn in,
especially on low grip surfaces?
作者: 倒錢落海    時間: 2007-7-25 20:06
頭直濕係冇咁好彎(之前試過頭直濕,後來換做頭單向)。而且用頭直濕時轉向servo耗用電量會比較高。
作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-26 01:10
原帖由 RGM-111 於 2007-7-21 00:48 發表
因為05T+  原廠 是 行  頭直"濕", 尾行呀差...今你古下  對掉之後是....行尾直濕..wor



I just change to 尾直濕 and 頭齿轮差速 is looks like better then before when i play drift thank you for your information

one more question can i use 頭直濕 and 尾直濕 for drift ar Thank you

[ 本帖最後由 Eric_116 於 2007-7-26 01:15 編輯 ]
作者: RGM-111    時間: 2007-7-26 23:54
頭直濕 and 尾直濕 ..可能 唔識 過灣... XD
我未試過啊
作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-27 00:52
原帖由 倒錢落海 於 2007-7-25 20:06 發表
頭直濕係冇咁好彎(之前試過頭直濕,後來換做頭單向)。而且用頭直濕時轉向servo耗用電量會比較高。



What is the name of 頭單向 in English ar Thank you
作者: 倒錢落海    時間: 2007-7-27 00:53
原帖由 Eric_116 於 2007-7-27 00:52 發表:What is the name of 頭單向 in English ar Thank you
front one way...
作者: Eric_116    時間: 2007-7-27 00:54
原帖由 RGM-111 於 2007-7-26 23:54 發表
頭直濕 and 尾直濕 ..可能 唔識 過灣... XD
我未試過啊


What about 尾單向 and 頭差速 ar is it better for drift(FW-05T+). Thank you
作者: RGM-111    時間: 2007-7-28 00:42
尾單向...要用頭 one way 改 的...因為 rotating direction 唔同.....if 你直接安個頭單係 尾....尾碌  應該 唔識行的 只有 條軸係到空轉




歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://rc-evo.com/xbbs/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2