RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

標題: ta-05同ta-05IFS比較??大家點揀?? [打印本頁]

作者: mazda787B 時間: 2008-5-27 03:31
標題: ta-05同ta-05IFS比較??大家點揀??
兩部車都叫TA-05,但IFS是不是好走好多呢??IFS出了,普通TA-05是否退役??都不知買那部好??

作者: mk9001 時間: 2008-5-27 03:43
梗係選擇TA-05IFS R好得多

作者: ansonlau 時間: 2008-5-27 10:16
標題: 回復 2# 的帖子
TA-05IFS R 大約幾錢呀師兄 ?

作者: sch 時間: 2008-5-27 10:34
Ta 05 啦, IFS 個設計,可裝矮殼外,無其它好處

作者: shungyan 時間: 2008-5-27 10:38
suppose there is nothing related to performance on the new shock attachment in IFS. The arrangement is only use to fit the low profile shell. Of course there will be some differents maybe (cause different chassis twist) but not equal to better!

作者: cc4321 時間: 2008-5-27 10:38
TA-05 IFS

作者: cowboy 時間: 2008-5-27 12:05

原帖由 shungyan 於 2008-5-27 10:38 發表

 登錄/註冊後可看大圖

suppose there is nothing related to performance on the new shock attachment in IFS. The arrangement is only use to fit the low profile shell. Of course there will be some differents maybe (cause diff ...

Agreed. But there should be difference in 'handling' as the position of the shock is quite different, according to experience. In the absence of live comparision, I tend to believe that TA05 will be better in performance (shock effect) as it is the same as most of the shock arrangement of existing popular touring cars. My opinion is that if you love that shell, you buy IFS. otherwise TA05. As far as I know, there are little difference in front suspension/steering of TA05/TA05 IFS such that some parts of them are not interchangeable.

作者: mazda787B 時間: 2008-5-27 12:42
多謝大家的詳細解釋,thx,我又學到野

作者: ktinchu 時間: 2008-5-27 16:56
ifs好似係原裝已經用reverse臂,應該好少少把

作者: cowboy 時間: 2008-5-28 10:10
You may also consider TA05R for better performance.

Or TA05 + TRF damper + universal shaft first if $$ is critical.

作者: shungyan 時間: 2008-5-29 00:15
totally agree with CowBoy C-hing!!

歡迎光臨 RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區 (https://rc-evo.com/xbbs/)