Hi nice to have someone who is interested in this subject,
Here is a good paragraph written by ROC military magazine " 全球防衛誌 261 期（2006年5月）" http://www.diic.com.tw/mag/mag261/261-56.htm
For copyright issue,therefore I only enclose part of the essay here
.........紅海軍為此歸納出「首輪齊射」的反航艦作戰原則，當遇到衝突不可避免時，己方艦隊將不顧一切地搶占有利戰位，利用自己飛彈在射程和破壞力的「不對稱優勢」，先發制人地將全部長程飛彈打出去，使敵艦隊在來不及作出反應前被消滅。根據俄羅斯海軍教案的論述，一次性對類似尼米茲級這樣的超級航艦的「三位一體」飽和攻擊，至少要達到90枚以上的飛彈攻擊，...................
Many of the Russian military doctrine carries from their WWII experience。 Does it remind you the battle of Kursk? With the numerous T-34 out fought the technology superior German Tiger ?
Of course American stress on Fire power as well, but no one on earth has their military budget to spend, and unlimited government bond to print for Chinese to buy , LOL.
Here is a good paragraph written by ROC military magazine " 全球防衛誌 261 期（2006年5月）"
師兄,
Just read the article, very informative of the Russia Navy's strategy. I suppose China is copying Russia's way because both countries are similar in many ways with lack of resources, correct?
Agree that the 飽和式攻擊 would be effective in close range but the Americans would not be that stupid to come into the firing range so would the Americans try to counter this strategy by keeping the fleet off the weapon range?
１。 In fact their needs are very different due to dissimilar geographer location and coast line. The reasons you see PLAN having a significant Russian fleet is due to political background. Detail would be beyond the scope of this forum.
2. Saturated attack, could be delivered by the mean of small arms to ICBM, the effective range of Kirov class is 450-550KM , which is about the distance from Hong Kong to 台南.
[Kirov 基洛夫級戰鬥巡洋艦] http://www.jkforum.net/thread-456200-1-6.html
收藏
勁正
嬲嬲
唉？
又買多隻戰艦喇
