RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房 - 香港RC遙控車討論區

 找回密碼
 新玩家註冊
搜索
查看: 4448|回復: 20
打印 上一主題 下一主題
收起左側

你對Walkera整體產品看法?

  [複製鏈接]
跳轉到指定樓層
1#
tanksamho 發表於 2011-2-27 02:08:15 | 只看該作者 回帖獎勵 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
你對Walkera 整體產品看法包括造工,用料品質,設計(電子&硬件)等...或可留言你對Walkera看法?
單選投票, 共有 44 人參與投票
您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
2#
nel3838 發表於 2011-2-28 08:07:22 | 只看該作者
Good effort on new designs, especially with 3.7V electronics which make lightweight aircraft possible which is great.  RC Tx and Rx also very good.  The main thing is need to provide clearer instructions on the various Tx/Rx functions.  Notice that there had been many upgrades on Tx/Rx versions and some are backward compatible, which is good, but the instructions are not very clear as to what is compatible to what.  And which features/functions than become enabled or disabled.

Overall, good R&D, and needs to improve much on documentation and communication.  Perhaps Walkera can start to consider other high end RC models, such as serious RC race cars.
3#
khho01 發表於 2011-2-28 13:45:46 | 只看該作者
出新機太快 D 舊機零件,又吾可以共用又貴,好快就沒 parts ...
壞處是 bad contact  接觸不良 (電池 & motor)
行尾無刷moter  重快死(CB100,4#3B ), 因為 沒bearing 要成日換,
好處是可以 full set 或 half set 買, 返來叉電就飛得.
4#
highbeing 發表於 2011-3-3 14:02:40 | 只看該作者
一個字"貴"
5#
pakpakpakhk 發表於 2011-3-12 10:52:36 | 只看該作者
CB100 is good!
6#
goflygo 發表於 2011-4-16 23:37:33 | 只看該作者
I like them mostly on their product design and performance of such smaller size heli. The CB100 tail motor is fine provided you can make a good soldering job after crash but still much better than those brushed motor.e.g the MSR 's tail motor.
7#
fun_heli 發表於 2011-4-17 00:56:36 | 只看該作者
貴貴貴貴
8#
g4tommy2000 發表於 2011-4-18 14:29:25 | 只看該作者
好玩,價錢唔系問題
9#
Kis`s 發表於 2011-4-22 15:20:23 | 只看該作者
好少地方有parts買, 貴
一炒機好易爛 (cb100) 對比solo pro同 trex100
10#
kenlau 發表於 2011-4-26 13:54:03 | 只看該作者
設計幾好,不過真的很貴!
11#
khho01 發表於 2011-4-26 14:09:56 | 只看該作者
唉 ! 加晒價 ... 20% 至 30% 很貴!
12#
khho01 發表於 2011-4-26 14:10:53 | 只看該作者
13#
DWKN 發表於 2011-4-28 16:21:09 | 只看該作者
Once I thought they were pioneers in making micro-sized RC helis especially those flybarless versions. I bought 2 of these (a 120VD01 and a 120VD02) and my comment is they are fragile (both plastic and metal parts) and the 3-axis gyro is not performing good.

Once I got the mCPX, I can say it flys a lot much better even without any metal parts. For a flybarless micro heli, the 3-axis gyro is more predictable / controllable and the performance can be comparable to larger helis using flybar system.
14#
mastersteno 發表於 2011-4-28 18:45:53 | 只看該作者
回復 DWKN 的帖子

So those flybarless models (e.g v120 series) are not so good when comparing with mCPX? I am interested in V120D6, cos its the cheapest 6ch flybarless model,,,if V120d1/2 are just fair,,I may not go for V120d6!
15#
DWKN 發表於 2011-4-29 16:57:12 | 只看該作者
回復 mastersteno 的帖子

I am not so sure whether both V120D6 and my V120D2 are using the same gyro control software. But for flying performance (I'm not flying 3D), the mCPX is much better.

BTW, V120D6 is not using brushless main motor. Performance might drop after some flights.
16#
highbeing 發表於 2011-5-9 17:00:52 | 只看該作者
其實我覺得佢做到依個檔次, 唔應該再出有刷motor. 用有刷係一個trick.
17#
asaq-wong 發表於 2011-5-21 01:23:30 | 只看該作者
a bit 貴 law~~
18#
TLMO 發表於 2014-2-10 16:03:04 來自手機 | 只看該作者
用唔過,品質劣質
19#
tc3driver 發表於 2014-2-10 18:44:15 | 只看該作者
本帖最後由 tc3driver 於 2014-2-10 18:48 編輯

Walkera出新機太快,但都吾係問題,舊model吾支援先係問題,玩一兩年已經無零件,100size的新機又改晒用有刷尾馬達(可能賣尾馬達好賺),要改件先有無刷,d控不停出新形號,為地球製造垃圾
20#
RCPEPPLE 發表於 2014-7-7 21:25:45 | 只看該作者
Walkera "貴"
為地球製造垃圾:@
您需要登錄後才可以回帖 登錄 | 新玩家註冊

本版積分規則

手機版|小黑屋|RC EVOLUTION - 遙控工房

GMT+8, 2024-5-2 06:15 , Processed in 0.037150 second(s), 17 queries , Gzip On.

Powered by Discuz! X3.2

© 2001-2013 Comsenz Inc.

快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表